Distributed works
Tube wells and community water-supply infrastructure were installed across many locations.
Representative visualClient case study · DPHE
From verified water-source delivery to national water intelligence.
A field monitoring system supplied by Tiger Park Limited helped DPHE connect installed infrastructure, technical records, photographic evidence and digital handover—creating a trusted basis for project oversight and contractor payment.
Client & project ownerDepartment of Public Health Engineering (DPHE)
ProjectSafe Water Supply Throughout the Country
DeploymentAround 2020
≈600,000water-source records accumulated
Field → deskevidence linked to project review
Record → paymentverification before contractor payment
Data → insightthe next opportunity
The assignment
DPHE needed visibility across a country-scale delivery programme.
For a distributed water-supply project, progress could not be understood through summary claims alone. The Project Director needed a dependable view of what had been installed, where it was located, what technical records supported it, and whether field evidence justified handover and payment.
Client ownership · Tiger Park solutionDPHE owns the Safe Water Supply project and its operational data.
Tiger Park Limited supplied the digital system used to monitor delivery, verify field evidence and support handover and contractor-payment decisions. This is a DPHE project enabled by Tiger Park technology—not an internal Tiger Park initiative.
Challenge
Turn dispersed field activity into evidence that could be reviewed and acted on.
Mixed technical records
Asset details, bore logs, water-quality reports, images and handover information had to stay connected.
Payment assurance
Project leadership needed a practical way to verify reported delivery before contractor payments.
Solution
One structured field record—from installation to handover.
The system, deployed around 2020 using earlier versions of what later became Tiger One and Sky Hawk under different product names, brought field and project information into a connected review workflow.
Tube-well inventory
Installed source details, location and status
Community systems
Water-supply infrastructure and pipe-network evidence
Bore logs
Depth-wise subsurface and construction records
Water quality
Field and laboratory test results linked to sources
Photographic proof
Field images connected to the reported asset
Digital handover
Structured certificates completing the delivery record
1CaptureField data, reports and images
→2ReviewProject team checks completeness
→3VerifyPD sees evidence against delivery
→4Handover & paymentDecision backed by the field record
Proven impact
A clearer line of sight between reported progress and contractor payment.
Project leadership could inspect field data and photographs without relying only on narrative progress reports.
Digital certificates sat alongside the underlying source and infrastructure records.
The delivery workflow accumulated close to 600,000 water-source records rather than producing a one-time project archive.
Data assets
The programme created more than an inventory.
Each record type adds a different analytical dimension. Together, they can connect place, infrastructure, subsurface conditions, water quality, evidence and delivery history.
Concept · source distribution
Lower densityHigher density
Concept · bore-log profile
0–12 mClay / silt
12–36 mFine sand
36–78 mPotential aquifer
78 m+Deep formation
Concept · quality pattern
6linked dimensions
- Parameter
- Location
- Depth
- Source type
- Season
- Trend
Illustrative analytical concepts—not maps, measurements or conclusions derived from DPHE data.
Future potential
Convert historical project records into water-resource intelligence.
The next phase is not simply another dashboard. It is a governed analytical layer that standardizes, validates and connects the historical dataset so planners and technical teams can ask better questions.
Water-resource potential maps
Combine source locations, yields, depth, geology and quality to reveal where different groundwater options are most promising.
Spatial and temporal trends
Compare places and periods to identify clustering, coverage gaps, changing conditions and recurring risks.
Water-quality intelligence
Explore contaminant patterns and relate results to geography, source type, depth and season.
Bore-log and geological analysis
Transform depth-layer records into comparable subsurface profiles and regional hydrogeological evidence.
Evidence-based technology selection
Match local conditions to suitable water-supply technologies using accumulated project evidence instead of isolated records.
A practical next step
Start with data readiness, then build decision products.
Assess completeness, units, location quality, duplicates and coding consistency.
Connect sources, bore logs, quality results, images, schemes and time.
Develop spatial, geological and quality analyses with domain specialists.
Publish governed maps, trends and technology-selection guidance.
From evidence to foresight